Nanoscale elucidation of Na,K-ATPase isoforms in dendritic spines
© Liebmann et al.; licensee Springer. 2013
Received: 25 September 2013
Accepted: 5 November 2013
Published: 9 November 2013
The dimensions of neuronal synapses suggest that optical super-resolution imaging methods are necessary for thorough investigation of protein distributions and interactions. Nanoscopic evaluation of neuronal samples has presented practical hurdles, but advancing methods are making synaptic protein topology and quantification measurements feasible. This work explores the application of Photoactivated Localization Microscopy (PALM) pointillistic super-resolution imaging for investigation of the membrane bound sodium pump, the Na,K-ATPase, in matured neurons.
Two isoforms of the sodium pump (ATP1a1 and ATP1a3) were studied in cultured neurons using the PALM-compatible fluorescent proteins PAGFP and mEos. Nanoscopic imaging reveals a compartmentalized distribution of sodium pumps in dendritic spines. Several nanoclusters of pumps are typically found in the spine head and fewer in the spine neck. The density of sodium pumps was estimated from a quantification of detected single molecules at 450–650 pump copies/μm2 in the spine heads.
We have utilized PALM for dissection of nanoscale localization in mature cultured neurons and demonstrated similar topology and quantification estimates with PAGFP and mEos. PALM topology assessments of the sodium pump appeared similar to previous STED studies, though quantification estimates varied, implying that labeling strategies, sample analysis and choice of nanoscopic imaging method can be critical factors for correct molecular quantification.
KeywordsSuper-resolution Photoactivated localization microscopy Synapse Na,K-ATPase Molecular quantification Intracellular sodium
The discrepancy between protein sizes and the resolution of classical light microscopy has compelled the advancement of imaging methodology. Recent techniques utilizing varying optical principles have successfully demonstrated resolution surpassing the diffraction limit (Dyba et al. 2003, Betzig et al. 2006, Rust et al. 2006, Sharonov and Hochstrasser 2006, Hell 2007, Huang et al. 2010). These super-resolved imaging methods have become valuable assets for describing the molecular complexity and distribution of interacting proteins within micro and nanodomains of varying biological samples. Protein organization within excitatory neuronal synapses, exemplifies the need for super-resolved investigation to elucidate protein interactions that shape their complex properties (Okabe 2007, Bito 2010).
Though no method exists without limitation, there has been some recent success applying optical imaging methods for both nanoscopic localization and quantification in neurons. Stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy and stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM) have effectively facilitated resolved distributions in neurons (Willig et al. 2006, Dani et al. 2010, Blom et al. 2012). Methods more compatible with live-cell imaging such as universal point accumulation in nanoscale topography (uPAINT) have also been utilized to estimate protein domains in synapses (Nair et al. 2013). Quantification of proteins in neurons has been performed with STED and STORM, generally with the use of immunolabeling techniques, which can result in incomplete labeling, sample modification and loss of measurement accuracy due to antibody sizes (Blom et al. 2011, Nair et al. 2013). Fluorescent proteins (FPs) or dyes directed to specific proteins and organelles have also been applied for live cell imaging (Hein et al. 2008, Shim et al. 2012). An alternative technique utilizing exogenous expression of photoactivatable FPs is known as photoactivated localization microscopy (PALM). It is typically a slower imaging method, but offers high precision without the use of antibodies and provides opportunities for molecular quantification (Greenfield et al. 2009, Scarselli et al. 2013).
In this study we outline a feasible approach toward super-resolution microscopy in neurons. We describe a neuronal sample preparation for investigating protein densities in mature synaptic domains and apply multiple super-resolution imaging approaches. As a sample protein, we have selected the Na,K-ATPase sodium pump, the principal energy transformer in the brain which is the essential protein responsible for maintaining the resting membrane potential and a major controller of intracellular ion homeostasis (Skou 1965, Sweadner 1979). We have previously estimated subcellular distribution and abundance of one sodium pump isoform, ATP1a3, in neurons with STED. Here we apply additional super-resolved imaging to two different pump isoforms, ATP1a1 and ATP1a3, while discussing the practical advantages of the different techniques (Blom et al. 2011). Using structured illumination microscopy (SIM), we access the dendritic distribution of the pump with high volumetric resolution (Gustafsson et al. 2008). We then turn to PALM for estimates of pump abundance in synaptic signaling domains within spines. Considering the increasing options for PALM probes used in localization microscopy, we have selected two of the commonly used FP variants, PAGFP and monomeric Eos (mEosFP), for comparing precision and protein density measurement in cultured neurons (Patterson and Lippincott-Schwartz 2002, McKinney et al. 2009, Zhang et al. 2012).
Hippocampal neurons were cultured according to our previously reported protocol, with the following deviations (Liebmann et al. 2012). Cells were seeded at a density of 2.6 × 104/cm2. Media added for routine changing contained an additional 0.5 mM L-glutamine (Sigma). Cells were transfected after 17 days in culture with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) and fixated or analyzed 6–7 days after transfection. Samples were fixed for 4 min at RT in paraformaldehyde (4% in PBS, warmed to 37°C). After washing 3 times in PBS, coverslips were mounted with Immu-mount (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and left to solidify overnight before imaging.
Constructs and transfection
A mammalian mEos2 vector was made by subcloning mEos2 from pRSETa mEos2 (Addgene plasmid 20341) into the EGFP-C1 vector backbone. Mutagenesis was performed according to Zhang et al. to convert mEos2 to mEos3.2 (Zhang et al. 2012). ATP1a1 and ATP1a3 plasmids were generated by subcloning the pump isoform into EGFP-C1, PAGFP-C1 (a kind gift from Dr. Jennifer Lippincott-Schwartz), mEos2-C1 and mEos3.2-C1vectors. The sequence for mCherry was subcloned into the EGFP-N3 vector backbone (replacing EGFP) before inserting the PSD-95 sequence as applied previously (Liebmann et al. 2012). Rat sequences of Na,K-ATPase isoforms and PSD-95 were used for subcloning. The calcium-sensitive GCaMP5 plasmid was acquired from Dr. Loren L. Looger (Addgene plasmid 31788). DNA plasmids were transfected with Lipofectamine 2000 (Life Technologies) according to manufacturer recommendations.
Super-resolution and confocal imaging was performed on a Zeiss 780LSM Elyra PS.1 system. Confocal scanning and structured illumination microscopy were done with a 63× (1.4 NA, oil) objective while PALM imaging was done with a 100× (1.46 NA, oil) objective. PALM imaging of PAGFP was accomplished with 405 nm activation and 488 nm (maximum output 100 mW) wide-field laser excitation at 15%. PALM imaging of mEosPFs was accomplished with 405 nm conversion and 561 nm (maximum output 100 mW) wide-field laser excitation at 20%. Wide-field 405 nm (maximum output 50 mW) activation/conversion intensities were kept at minimal levels to restrict stochastic activation events to low and distinct single molecule densities, and then gradually increased to maintain sufficient activation/conversion during imaging. Lasers were kept at oblique angles (near-TIRF) to maintain low axial excitation thickness and enhance signal contrast. PALM images consisted of 5×103 acquisition frames of 50 ms and 100 ms for PAGFP and mEosFPs, respectively. Detector EMCCD-gain on the Andor iXon DU 897 (512×512 pixels) was set at 100. PSD-95 images were acquired immediately before PALM imaging by wide-field laser excitation at 561 nm. SIM imaging was performed with 488 nm excitation (3%), an EMCCD-gain of 30, a grating period of 28.0 μm, 3 rotations, and averaging of 2 frames. Calcium spikes were detected at 3 Hz acquisition using an inverted Zeiss Axiovert 200 with a 40× (1.3 NA, oil) objective equipped with an Andor iXon + 897 EMCCD camera and a wide-field X-Cite lamp with 10% illumination intensity and a standard GFP excitation-dichroic-emission filter set (Semrock).
PALM analysis was performed with the Zeiss ELYRA P integrated system software (ZEN 2011 SP2 Black). Peak intensity to noise ratio for molecular detection was evaluated at 4.5 and 6.0 for PAGFP and mEosFPs, respectively. Peak mask size was 3×3 pixels (300×300 nm2 in the image focal plane). Grouping maximum on times and off gap times (5 frames) were 250 ms and 500 ms for PAGFP and mEosFPs, respectively. The grouping pixel radius for re-occurring and persistent events was set to 150 nm. Rendering was done with a Gaussian display mode, 10 nm/pixel and 0.5×PSF expansion factor. Drift correction was done with model based autocorrelation of whole image section registrations. To account for photoblinking in molecular quantification we applied fitting methods according to Annibale et al. (Annibale et al. 2011). SIM analysis was generated with integrated Zeiss ELYRA S system software (ZEN 2011 SP2 Black) with the following parameters: manual processing settings with SR frequency weighting (1.5), maximum isotropy and auto noise filtering.
Results and discussion
To further improve the precision of the pump distribution in neurons, we selected the PALM pointillistic super-resolution approach. Though a majority of single molecule super-resolution studies suggest fresh sample preparation and aqueous TIRF imaging protocols, this is less ideal for dissociated neuronal cultures where a majority of the cell structure is far from the glass surface. Instead we have conveniently applied conventional fixation and mounting procedures to our cultured neurons, allowing sample preservation as done with confocal and SIM preparations. Sample fixation ensures that no subcellular movement of the investigated pumps occurs during the recording time. To maintain acceptable axial resolution and maximize signal contrast away from the glass surface, we excite the sample with oblique angle or near-TIRF illumination. With the described sample preparation and experimental setup, PALM provides a protein distribution in neurons with nearly the highest precision possible with light microscopy without the inherent localization accuracy loss from antibody complexes.
For quantification, spines were isolated from whole cell recordings and individually assessed for single molecules density calculations (Figure 5b). Importantly, the measured values should be considered as approximate as each of the probes has limitations preventing perfect detection. Of primary interest is activation/conversion efficiency and reporter photoblinking. In each case, some loss of accuracy could be expected for molecular counting and absolute density constructions. We have applied a reported method for reliable estimation of the error due to photoblinking in PALM imaging (Annibale et al. 2011). According to our fitting of varied dark times in the low dark time regime (Figure 5c), the estimated overcount due to photoblinking is around 25% for mEosFP and 40% for PAGFP. Applying these adjustments, the distributions of Na,K-ATPase isoforms shown in Figures 3 and 4 were finally quantified on the single molecule level and found to be around 450–650 molecules/μm2 in individual spines (Figure 5d). Though important physical properties like extinction coefficient, quantum yield, photostability and activation/conversion efficiency are different for PAGFP and mEosFPs, our measured molecule densities are largely independent of used FP (Figure 5c) (McKinney et al. 2009). This suggests that both probes can be utilized for quantitative molecular imaging at the nanoscale in neuron preparations with similar effectiveness.
An intrinsic advantage of using PALM to demonstrate super-resolved localization is the independence from antibody complexes, which can introduce localization inaccuracies from unspecific labeling and antibody displacement. Additionally, neuronal labeling by transfection results in exogenous expression in some cells, which allows for single cell examination and eliminates contamination from presynaptic branches or neighboring cells. This is a concern when examining a protein like the Na,K-ATPase which exists in both presynaptic and postsynaptic membranes (Pietrini et al. 1992, Azarias et al. 2013). However, fusion proteins should always be used with the caveat that they provide exogenous protein and possible overexpression. Expression regulation of the sodium pump is well characterized and is known to be limited by the beta subunit (Tokhtaeva et al. 2009). Without hetero-oligomerization with the beta subunit, alpha subunits are rapidly degraded before maturation and translocation can occur (Geering 2001). Albeit, some increased expression may be attributed to competition with the non-transfected alpha isoform (ATP1a1 vs. ATP1a3) for available beta subunits, which in part may be a reflection of the spread and median variation seen in Figure 5c. Exact molecular quantification of endogenous protein amount thus remains a major challenge for super-resolution microscopy.
With the discussion of photoblinking and overexpression in mind, we can consider our PALM deductions as possible overestimates of pump density in spines, as opposed to the previous STED measurements which are likely an underestimate due to incomplete labeling (Blom et al. 2011). To perform absolute quantification of protein density using super-resolution microscopy, endogenous expression of proteins should be assessed. One such approach is to use transgenic animals with knock-in of a FP fusion to the protein of interest. This has recently been demonstrated with the scaffold protein Gephyrin (Specht et al. 2013). Interestingly it was also found that exogenous expression of Gephyrin is highly controlled, resulting in similar molecular density in postsynaptic clusters.
Despite the limitations in quantification that antibody labeling in STED or exogenous expression in PALM imaging gives, we can estimate the number of sodium pumps in a dendritic spine to be between less than one hundred to up to several hundreds. Is this a functional number and is it sufficient for physiological sodium (and potassium) regulation in dendritic spines? Stated differently, does super-resolution allow deduction of physiologically relevant pump counts? For a potential change of 100 mV to occur in 20 ms across the membrane of a spine head with a 500 nm diameter (≈1 μm2 membrane area) and a membrane conductance of 0.01 F/m2, approximately 250 sodium ions enter the spine. As the sodium pump may extrude three sodium ions per turnover, about 80 pumps are thus needed to restore intracellular sodium (assuming a restricted diffusion due to the spine neck) in a single pump cycle. The estimated amount of sodium pumps thus seems to be more than enough for a single transient membrane potential spike. Long trains of excitatory signaling (i.e. 100 action potential stimuli) may raise the sodium levels in dendritic spines by factors more than 10 times this amount (Rose 2002). Accordingly, the number of sodium pumps previously estimated with STED might be insufficient for a fast regulation of high sodium challenges, while PALM likely provides a somewhat inherent overestimate. A possible conclusion will thus be that the true number of sodium pumps is between those estimates, which delivers is a sufficient and dynamic number of pumps to provide capacity for rapid restoration of sodium levels and preventing the postsynaptic spine compartment from being exposed to a prolonged high sodium concentration.
Current super-resolution imaging methods provide a means of investigating protein organization at a level not previously feasible with optical techniques. In this study, we demonstrated the applicability of different FPs for dissecting the nanoscopic localization of proteins in ‘typical’ neuron preparations. Using PALM, we imaged the distribution of the Na,K-ATPase in cultured hippocampal neurons at 25 nm and 20 nm mean precision with PAGFP and mEosFPs, respectively. Our results show similar pump topology to that presented previously with STED, an alternative super-resolution technique which allows endogenous protein localization.
Though quantification with super-resolution techniques has seen limited use, we have shown efficacy of PALM for basic molecular counting estimates, a method which will see further advancement with improved photoactivatable FPs and more understanding of photoconversion and blinking characteristics. Density estimates were similar between different PALM probes, but they produced somewhat different results from antibody-dependent STED measurements on endogenous sodium pumps, highlighting inherent differences in those nanoscopic approaches. With all of the discussed methods there are clear advantages and limitations, and selection of the correct approach is dependent on specific aims such as volumetric resolution and controlled expression levels as well as factors including the ability to fuse fluorescent labels to a protein of interest or availability of specific antibodies.
In the end, super-resolution imaging approaches allow investigation of protein distributions and even novel quantification that may resolve important biological questions or introduce new concepts of functional interaction in the brain. It remains to be shown how the sodium pump distribution alters resting membrane potential dynamics or how it can be modulated on the individual spine level, but this study contributes initial quantitative assessment of expression in spines that may add insight into the capacity of pump variants to regulate intracellular sodium.
This project was funded by the Swedish research council (VR 2010–4270), Tornspiran Foundation and Märta och Gunnar V Philipsson foundation.
- Akerboom J, Chen TW, Wardill TJ, Tian L, Marvin JS, Mutlu S, Calderon NC, Esposti F, Borghuis BG, Sun XR, Gordus A, Orger MB, Portugues R, Engert F, Macklin JJ, Filosa A, Aggarwal A, Kerr RA, Takagi R, Kracun S, Shigetomi E, Khakh BS, Baier H, Lagnado L, Wang SS, Bargmann CI, Kimmel BE, Jayaraman V, Svoboda K, Kim DS, Schreiter ER, Looger LL: Optimization of a GCaMP calcium indicator for neural activity imaging. J Neurosci 2012, 32: 13819–13840. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2601-12.2012PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Annibale P, Vanni S, Scarselli M, Rothlisberger U, Radenovic A: Quantitative photo activated localization microscopy: unraveling the effects of photoblinking. PLoS One 2011, 6: e22678. 10.1371/journal.pone.0022678PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Azarias G, Kruusmagi M, Connor S, Akkuratov EE, Liu XL, Lyons D, Brismar H, Broberger C, Aperia A: A specific and essential role for Na, K-ATPase alpha3 in neurons co-expressing alpha1 and alpha3. J Biol Chem 2013, 288: 2734–2743. 10.1074/jbc.M112.425785PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Betzig E, Patterson GH, Sougrat R, Lindwasser OW, Olenych S, Bonifacino JS, Davidson MW, Lippincott-Schwartz J, Hess HF: Imaging intracellular fluorescent proteins at nanometer resolution. Science 2006, 313: 1642–1645. 10.1126/science.1127344PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bito H: The chemical biology of synapses and neuronal circuits. Nat Chem Biol 2010, 6: 560–563. 10.1038/nchembio.408PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Blom H, Ronnlund D, Scott L, Spicarova Z, Widengren J, Bondar A, Aperia A, Brismar H: Spatial distribution of Na + -K + -ATPase in dendritic spines dissected by nanoscale superresolution STED microscopy. BMC Neurosci 2011, 12: 16. 10.1186/1471-2202-12-16PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Blom H, Ronnlund D, Scott L, Spicarova Z, Rantanen V, Widengren J, Aperia A, Brismar H: Nearest neighbor analysis of dopamine D1 receptors and Na(+)-K(+)-ATPases in dendritic spines dissected by STED microscopy. Microsc Res Tech 2012, 75: 220–228. 10.1002/jemt.21046PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dani A, Huang B, Bergan J, Dulac C, Zhuang X: Superresolution imaging of chemical synapses in the brain. Neuron 2010, 68: 843–856. 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.11.021PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dyba M, Jakobs S, Hell SW: Immunofluorescence stimulated emission depletion microscopy. Nat Biotechnol 2003, 21: 1303–1304. 10.1038/nbt897PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Geering K: The functional role of beta subunits in oligomeric P-type ATPases. J Bioenerg Biomembr 2001, 33: 425–438. 10.1023/A:1010623724749PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Greenfield D, McEvoy AL, Shroff H, Crooks GE, Wingreen NS, Betzig E, Liphardt J: Self-organization of the Escherichia coli chemotaxis network imaged with super-resolution light microscopy. PLoS Biol 2009, 7: e1000137. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000137PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gustafsson MG, Shao L, Carlton PM, Wang CJ, Golubovskaya IN, Cande WZ, Agard DA, Sedat JW: Three-dimensional resolution doubling in wide-field fluorescence microscopy by structured illumination. Biophys J 2008, 94: 4957–4970. 10.1529/biophysj.107.120345PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hein B, Willig KI, Hell SW: Stimulated emission depletion (STED) nanoscopy of a fluorescent protein-labeled organelle inside a living cell. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008, 105: 14271–14276. 10.1073/pnas.0807705105PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hell SW: Far-field optical nanoscopy. Science 2007, 316: 1153–1158. 10.1126/science.1137395PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huang B, Babcock H, Zhuang X: Breaking the diffraction barrier: super-resolution imaging of cells. Cell 2010, 143: 1047–1058. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.12.002PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liebmann T, Kruusmagi M, Sourial-Bassillious N, Bondar A, Svenningsson P, Flajolet M, Greengard P, Scott L, Brismar H, Aperia A: A noncanonical postsynaptic transport route for a GPCR belonging to the serotonin receptor family. J Neurosci 2012, 32: 17998–18008. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1804-12.2012PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lippincott-Schwartz J, Patterson GH: Photoactivatable fluorescent proteins for diffraction-limited and super-resolution imaging. Trends Cell Biol 2009, 19: 555–565. 10.1016/j.tcb.2009.09.003PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McKinney SA, Murphy CS, Hazelwood KL, Davidson MW, Looger LL: A bright and photostable photoconvertible fluorescent protein. Nat Methods 2009, 6: 131–133. 10.1038/nmeth.1296PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nair D, Hosy E, Petersen JD, Constals A, Giannone G, Choquet D, Sibarita JB: Super-resolution imaging reveals that AMPA receptors inside synapses Are dynamically organized in nanodomains regulated by PSD95. J Neurosci 2013, 33: 13204–13224. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2381-12.2013PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Okabe S: Molecular anatomy of the postsynaptic density. Mol Cell Neurosci 2007, 34: 503–518. 10.1016/j.mcn.2007.01.006PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Patterson GH, Lippincott-Schwartz J: A photoactivatable GFP for selective photolabeling of proteins and cells. Science 2002, 297: 1873–1877. 10.1126/science.1074952PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pietrini G, Matteoli M, Banker G, Caplan MJ: Isoforms of the Na, K-ATPase are present in both axons and dendrites of hippocampal neurons in culture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992, 89: 8414–8418. 10.1073/pnas.89.18.8414PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rose CR: Na + signals at central synapses. Neuroscientist 2002, 8: 532–539. 10.1177/1073858402238512PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rust MJ, Bates M, Zhuang X: Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM). Nat Methods 2006, 3: 793–795. 10.1038/nmeth929PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Scarselli M, Annibale P, Gerace C, Radenovic A: Enlightening G-protein-coupled receptors on the plasma membrane using super-resolution photoactivated localization microscopy. Biochem Soc Trans 2013, 41: 191–196. 10.1042/BST20120250PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sharonov A, Hochstrasser RM: Wide-field subdiffraction imaging by accumulated binding of diffusing probes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006, 103: 18911–18916. 10.1073/pnas.0609643104PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shim SH, Xia C, Zhong G, Babcock HP, Vaughan JC, Huang B, Wang X, Xu C, Bi GQ, Zhuang X: Super-resolution fluorescence imaging of organelles in live cells with photoswitchable membrane probes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012, 109: 13978–13983. 10.1073/pnas.1201882109PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Skou JC: Enzymatic basis for active transport of Na + and K + across cell membrane. Physiol Rev 1965, 45: 596–617.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Specht CG, Izeddin I, Rodriguez PC, El Beheiry M, Rostaing P, Darzacq X, Dahan M, Triller A: Quantitative nanoscopy of inhibitory synapses: counting gephyrin molecules and receptor binding sites. Neuron 2013, 79: 308–321. 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.05.013PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stepanenko OV, Shcherbakova DM, Kuznetsova IM, Turoverov KK, Verkhusha VV: Modern fluorescent proteins: from chromophore formation to novel intracellular applications. Biotechniques 2011, 51: 313–314. 316, 318 passimPubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sweadner KJ: Two molecular forms of (Na+ + K+)-stimulated ATPase in brain. Separation, and difference in affinity for strophanthidin. J Biol Chem 1979, 254: 6060–6067.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tokhtaeva E, Sachs G, Vagin O: Assembly with the Na, K-ATPase alpha(1) subunit is required for export of beta(1) and beta(2) subunits from the endoplasmic reticulum. Biochemistry 2009, 48: 11421–11431. 10.1021/bi901438zPubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Willig KI, Rizzoli SO, Westphal V, Jahn R, Hell SW: STED microscopy reveals that synaptotagmin remains clustered after synaptic vesicle exocytosis. Nature 2006, 440: 935–939. 10.1038/nature04592PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang M, Chang H, Zhang Y, Yu J, Wu L, Ji W, Chen J, Liu B, Lu J, Liu Y, Zhang J, Xu P, Xu T: Rational design of true monomeric and bright photoactivatable fluorescent proteins. Nat Methods 2012, 9: 727–729. 10.1038/nmeth.2021PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.